a. Determine the net present value for the two machines. Use the present value of an annuity of $1 table in the chapter (Exhibit 2). Round to the nearest dollar.
b. Determine the present value index for the two machines. Round to two decimal places.
c. If Diamond & Turf has sufficient funds for only one of the machines and qualitative factors are equal between the two machines, in which machine should it invest?
Answer:
a. Annual net cash flow—Sewing Machine:
$80,640 = 1,800 hours × (290 baseballs – 150 baseballs) × $0.32 per baseball
Annual net cash flow—Packing Machine:
$29,400 = 1,400 hours × $21 labor cost saved per hour
Sewing Machine:
Annual net cash flow (at the end of each of 8 years)………………………… $ 80,640
× Present value of an annuity of $1 at 15% for 8 years (Exhibit 2)………… 4.487
Present value of annual net cash flows………………………………………… $361,832
Less amount to be invested……………………………………………………… 260,000
Net present value…………………………………………………………………… $101,832
Packing Machine:
Annual net cash flow (at the end of each of 8 years)………………………… $ 29,400
× Present value of an annuity of $1 at 15% for 8 years (Exhibit 2)………… 4.487
Present value of annual net cash flows………………………………………… $131,918
Less amount to be invested……………………………………………………… 85,000
Net present value…………………………………………………………………… $ 46,918
b. Present Value Index =
Total Present Value of Net Cash Flow
Amount to Be Invested
Present value index
of the sewing machine: =
Present value index
of the packing machine: =
$361,832
$260,000
$131,918
$85,000
= 1.39
= 1.55
c. The present value index indicates that the packing machine would be the
preferred investment, assuming that all other qualitative considerations are
equal. Note that the net present value of the sewing machine is greater than
the packing machine’s. However, the sewing machine requires over triple the
investment than the packing machine ($260,000 vs. $85,000), for barely
double the extra net present value ($101,832 vs. $46,918). Thus, the present
value index indicates the packing machine is favored. If there were sufficient
capital for both investments, then they would both be attractive opportunities.
This solution does not consider the alternative use of remaining cash, which is
an additional complexity beyond the scope of this text.
No comments:
Post a Comment